How to Implement a Chess in Education Program
There is no single best approach to implementing a Chess in Education program that works for everyone. Here are some considerations to keep in mind as you formulate a plan that would work for your organization.
-
- Consider your educational goals; select a CIE approach (See CIE Approaches).
- Consider these key program design questions:
- When will teaching take place?
- Who will teach?
- What type of planning approach will be used?
-
- Informal – Bottom-up implementations; typically initiated by one or more teacher advocates at a single school.
- Pros: Bottom-up implementation; lower administrator time commitment, relatively easy to implement if resources are available.
- Cons: ad hoc, transient (due to turnover), and not scalable; minimal quality / performance tracking]
- Formal – a top-down approach with administrator planning, oversight, and monitoring, designed for scalability and sustainability.
- Pros: Increased scalability, and sustainability (less susceptible to personnel turnover issues).
- Cons: Higher administrator time commitment.
- Informal – Bottom-up implementations; typically initiated by one or more teacher advocates at a single school.
-
- Launch CIE Program Planning
- Assign a team and (as needed) contact CIE Service & Product providers for consultation, training (essential!), resources, and support. [Our CIE Coalition members can help.]